• New Content
  e-mail list

• home page

• The BC
• Dr. Gerald E. Aardsma
• ARP

• relevance
• missing millennium

• reliability

• basics
• precision
• assumptions
• invalidated?

• location
• Saudi Arabia

• conquest of
• Wood's chronology

• conquest of
• FEATURE
  

• conventional dates
• evidence from Egypt
• evidence from Sinai

• search for

• E-mail us

• ark search
• Bible chronology
• "The BC" publication
• Heshbon
• horses and chariots in Egypt
• Jericho --- Joshua's curse
• missing millenium: textual
• Mt. Sinai
• new stele mentioning Israel
• radiocarbon
• teaching science and creation
• tree rings
• virtual history

• The Exodus Happened 2450 B.C.
• Age of the Earth Collection
• A New Approach...

• Volume 1 (1995)
• Volume 2 (1996)
• Volume 3 (1997)
• Volume 4 (1998)
• Volume 5 (1999)
• Volume 6 (2000)
• Volume 7 (2001)
• Volume 8 (2002)
• Volume 9 (2008)

Correspondence: Tree Rings

December 5, 2006

Hello,

I'm just wondering how Dr. Aardsma might respond to this article: "Tree ring dating (dendrochronology)," by Don Batten. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/docs/tree_ring.asp

Thanks and blessings,
Andy

Hello Andy,

I would mainly point out that Dr. Batten has failed to address (or even acknowledge) a quantitative argument contrary to his conclusion which I presented within the standard creationist literature years ago (Gerald E. Aardsma, "Tree-ring Dating and Multiple Ring Growth per Year", Creation Research Society Quarterly, vol 29, 1993, 184--189).

See http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_treerings.php for more factual information contrary to Dr. Batten's claims.

Dr. Aardsma