Advanced Search

Sign Up
  New Content e-mail list

Home
  home page

About
  The BC
  Dr. Gerald E. Aardsma
  ARP

Topics
  overview
  Biblical Chronology
    relevance
    missing millennium
  Dendrochronology
    reliability
  Radiocarbon Dating
    basics
    precision
    assumptions
    invalidated?
  Mt. Sinai
    location
    Saudi Arabia
  Jericho
    conquest of
    Wood's chronology
  Ai
    conquest of
    FEATURE
  The Exodus
    conventional dates
    evidence from Egypt
    evidence from Sinai
  Noah's Ark
    search for

Contact Us
  E-mail us

Correspondence
  "The BC" publication
  Bible chronology
  horses and chariots in Egypt
  missing millenium: textual
  Mt. Sinai
  radiocarbon
  tree rings
  virtual history

Resources
  book
  newsletters
    Volume 1 (1995)
    Volume 2 (1996)
    Volume 3 (1997)
    Volume 4 (1998)
    Volume 5 (1999)
    Volume 6 (2000)
    Volume 7 (2001)
    Volume 8 (2002)
  time charts

Store
  vending machine

Correspondence: Tree Rings

December 5, 2006

Hello,

I'm just wondering how Dr. Aardsma might respond to this article: "Tree ring dating (dendrochronology)," by Don Batten. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/docs/tree_ring.asp

Thanks and blessings,
Andy

Hello Andy,

I would mainly point out that Dr. Batten has failed to address (or even acknowledge) a quantitative argument contrary to his conclusion which I presented within the standard creationist literature years ago (Gerald E. Aardsma, "Tree-ring Dating and Multiple Ring Growth per Year", Creation Research Society Quarterly, vol 29, 1993, 184--189).

See http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_treerings.php for more factual information contrary to Dr. Batten's claims.

Dr. Aardsma

 
 
  Copyright © 2002-2007 Aardsma Research & Publishing. All rights reserved.