|
|
|
|
Sign Up New Content e-mail list Home home page About The BC Dr. Gerald E. Aardsma ARP Topics overview Biblical Chronology relevance missing millennium Dendrochronology reliability Radiocarbon Dating basics precision assumptions invalidated? Mt. Sinai location Saudi Arabia Jericho conquest of Wood's chronology Ai conquest of FEATURE The Exodus conventional dates evidence from Egypt evidence from Sinai Noah's Ark search for Contact Us E-mail us Correspondence "The BC" publication Bible chronology horses and chariots in Egypt missing millenium: textual Mt. Sinai radiocarbon tree rings virtual history Resources book newsletters Volume 1 (1995) Volume 2 (1996) Volume 3 (1997) Volume 4 (1998) Volume 5 (1999) Volume 6 (2000) Volume 7 (2001) Volume 8 (2002) time charts Store vending machine |
Correspondence: Tree RingsDecember 5, 2006Hello,I'm just wondering how Dr. Aardsma might respond to this article: "Tree ring dating (dendrochronology)," by Don Batten. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/docs/tree_ring.asp
Thanks and blessings, Hello Andy,I would mainly point out that Dr. Batten has failed to address (or even acknowledge) a quantitative argument contrary to his conclusion which I presented within the standard creationist literature years ago (Gerald E. Aardsma, "Tree-ring Dating and Multiple Ring Growth per Year", Creation Research Society Quarterly, vol 29, 1993, 184--189). See http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_treerings.php for more factual information contrary to Dr. Batten's claims.
Dr. Aardsma |